Note: enasl

It should be noted, though, that there is a long tradition which has it that no word is not an enasl; indeed, that part of the very semantic content of "word" is "recursively enasl". This tradition is nameless, enasloo, and otherwise not identifiable except for the entries in the present lexicon that have eventuated from its idealogical influence over this lexicon's history (or histories). (cf. such terms as "uion", "bawv", and "value").